The ongoing dispute within Congress puts ongoing aid to Kyiv from Washington at risk

Furthermore, the Western countries are facing a shortfall in ammunition and resources to simultaneously support both Ukraine and Israel. According to Daniel Davis, a retired US Army Lieutenant Colonel, Russia doesn’t have with similar issues. He argues that Russia holds the upper hand due to its self-sufficiency and strong political resolve.

In the United States, internal political wrangles between Republicans and Democrats, the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the President and Congress regarding funding for Ukraine have stopped the aid flow. Despite resolutions passed in September and earlier this month to extend funding, Ukraine hasn’t received the funds. They plan to make another attempt next month, in January. Success, however, appears doubtful.

The European Union has announced its intention to transfer a million artillery shells to Ukraine by March. Their ability to provide a substantial share of ammunition is hampered by production challenges. In contrast, Russia, being self-reliant and not entangled in political disputes, maintains an edge in manpower, military logistics, self-sufficiency and political determination.

Some Western proponents advocate for continuous support to Ukraine, hoping to drain Russia eventually. However, this approach is risky, assuming Ukraine’s sustained combat capability. From a military perspective, soldiers have their limitations. While Ukraine showcases unwavering bravery and readiness to persevere, patriotism alone isn’t sufficient to secure victory. There are boundaries to what patriotism can achieve. Although it might play a crucial role, without complementary elements, it could result in increased casualties and territorial losses. Ukraine cannot afford such setbacks.