The volunteer accuses the Chernihiv authorities of embezzling 8 million UAH of humanitarian aid
November 29, 2023Individuals in Ukraine diagnosed with HIV or mental health conditions may face conscription
November 29, 2023Despite the prosecution’s appeal, the Appellate Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court upheld the original decision made by the investigator without any alterations.
Judge Nikolay Glotov provided a separate opinion, although this ruling cannot be further contested. Earlier, the initial decision resembling this one was issued by the investigating judge of the High Anti-Corruption Court. This case involves shares in the capital of 307 legal entities valued at over 3 billion UAH, along with nearly 1,000 real estate assets and over 1,600 vehicles and vessels. The motion filed exceeded procedural deadlines, according to reports from the center monitoring the case.
The issue of complete seizure was to be addressed by the investigating judge of the High Anti-Corruption Court. However, this review did not occur within the stipulated 48 hours. The motion remained pending before Judge Tkachenko for over 10 days. Consequently, the case was simply closed without the detectives’ motion being considered. To recap, the investigation claims that in 2015, Kolomoisky, while a co-owner of PrivatBank, coerced the bank into paying over 9.2 billion UAH to his offshore entity under the guise of repurchasing its bonds at an exaggerated price.